They thought they had a marketing problem. They had a merchandising problem.
A $50M apparel brand was spending aggressively on acquisition and seeing the traffic. Conversion was acceptable. But revenue wasn't growing the way the spend justified, and nobody could explain the gap.
When we dug into the data, the answer wasn't in the ad account. It was in the assortment.
The Real Problem
Sell-through analysis by SKU showed that a significant portion of the catalog was underperforming — not because customers weren't finding it, but because the product-price relationship wasn't working at the margin level the business needed. Some of the highest-traffic SKUs were also the lowest-margin ones. The acquisition spend was efficiently driving customers to the wrong products.
The Fix
We built an assortment and pricing framework that helped the buying team make decisions based on contribution margin by SKU — not just revenue or sell-through rate in isolation. Slow-moving inventory got repriced or retired. The acquisition budget got realigned toward the products that actually made money when they sold.
Revenue grew 25%. Costs dropped 15%. Not from a new marketing channel or a bigger budget — from making better decisions with the data that was already there.
The most expensive marketing problem is usually not a marketing problem at all. It's a finance and merchandising problem that marketing spend is temporarily obscuring.
Want to talk about this?
If your marketing spend isn't translating to margin, the answer might not be in the ad account.
Book a Call →